All 2012 Audi TT Experts' Reviews
|
Base MSRP
Brand new
$ 48,400 - 67,600
|
Avg Price
Used
$ 56,495
|
|
|
|
|
I Say
76 %
(2.5 TFSI quattro)
|
I Say
79 %
(2.5 TFSI quattro)
|
|
|
Review details
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (75%) |
   |
| Accessories (74%) |
|
| Space and Access (60%) |
|
| Comfort (75%) |
|
|
| Performance (82%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics (87%) |
|
| Safety (72%) |
|
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
|
| Interior (80%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
|
| General ergonomics (80%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
|
| Sound system (80%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
|
| Rear space and access (60%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (60%) |
|
| Storage capacity (60%) |
|
| Access to mechanical components (70%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
|
| Driving position (80%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
|
| Noise level (60%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (90%) |
|
| Engine output (90%) |
|
| Transmission (90%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
|
| Handling (90%) |
|
| Braking (90%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (90%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (80%) |
|
| Visibility (70%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
 |
No red lights
|
 |
Barely functional rear seat
Not the kindest fuel economy
Low roofline intrudes upon visibility
|
 |
One of the fastest cars at any price
Unflappable handling characteristics
Sufficient benevolence for daily life
Terrorizing exhaust howl
Value
|
|
|
2012 Audi TT RS Coupe 2.5 TFSI quattro
|
|
|
By Lesley Wimbush
Wednesday, May 02, 2012
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (80%) |
|
| Accessories (80%) |
|
| Space and Access (66%) |
|
| Comfort (75%) |
|
|
| Performance (85%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics (87%) |
|
| Safety (77%) |
|
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
|
| Interior (80%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
|
| General ergonomics (80%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
|
| Sound system (80%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
|
| Rear space and access (60%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (60%) |
|
| Storage capacity (60%) |
|
| Access to mechanical components (70%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
|
| Driving position (80%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
|
| Noise level (60%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (90%) |
|
| Engine output (90%) |
|
| Transmission (90%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
|
| Handling (90%) |
|
| Braking (90%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (90%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (80%) |
|
| Visibility (70%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
|
No red lights
|
|
Rather impractical
|
|
Superb Handling
Well-balanced
Great performance
|
|
Auto journalist & Consumer Ratings
|
|
Consumer Rating
n/a
(0 ratings)
|
|
