All 2009 Ford F-150 4x4 SuperCrew Long Bed Experts' Reviews
|
Base MSRP
Brand new
$ 38,899 - 55,699
|
Avg Price
Used
$ 29,316
|
Review details
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (85%) |
     |
| Accessories (82%) |
     |
| Space and Access (82%) |
     |
| Comfort (82%) |
     |
|
| Performance (72%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (70%) |
     |
| Safety (87%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
     |
| Interior (90%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (90%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (90%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (90%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (90%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (90%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
     |
| Noise level (90%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (80%) |
     |
| Engine output (80%) |
     |
| Transmission (90%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (60%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (70%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
     |
| Mirrors (80%) |
     |
| Visibility (90%) |
     |
| General safety (90%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
 |
None
|
 |
Poor fuel economy
|
 |
Bold exterior design and stunning interior
Superb operational refinement
Segment-exclusive convenience items
Smooth stable ride
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (85%) |
     |
| Accessories (86%) |
     |
| Space and Access (76%) |
     |
| Comfort (82%) |
     |
|
| Performance (65%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (75%) |
     |
| Safety (82%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
     |
| Interior (90%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (90%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (90%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (90%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (90%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (90%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
     |
| Noise level (90%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (80%) |
     |
| Engine output (80%) |
     |
| Transmission (90%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (60%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (70%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
     |
| Mirrors (80%) |
     |
| Visibility (90%) |
     |
| General safety (90%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
 |
Wide turning diameter complicates parking
|
 |
Fuel consumption
Rear-seat cushion is too low
|
 |
Smooth ride
Excellent towing capacity
Well-appointed cabin
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (82%) |
     |
| Accessories (80%) |
     |
| Space and Access (97%) |
     |
| Comfort (87%) |
     |
|
| Performance (80%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (77%) |
     |
| Safety (86%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
     |
| Interior (90%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (90%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (90%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (90%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (90%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (90%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
     |
| Noise level (90%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (80%) |
     |
| Engine output (80%) |
     |
| Transmission (90%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (60%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (70%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
     |
| Visibility (90%) |
     |
| General safety (90%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
 |
Needs gearshift position indicator in instrument cluster
Spongy, weak brake pedal feel
|
 |
Some low-budget interior materials
|
 |
Great looking and roomy interior
Easy cabin access
Great stereo / navigation / phone system
Truly ready to work
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (82%) |
     |
| Accessories (84%) |
     |
| Space and Access (88%) |
     |
| Comfort (82%) |
     |
|
| Performance (77%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (77%) |
     |
| Safety (85%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
     |
| Interior (90%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (90%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (90%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (90%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (90%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (90%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
     |
| Noise level (90%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (80%) |
     |
| Engine output (80%) |
     |
| Transmission (90%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (60%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (70%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
     |
| Mirrors (80%) |
     |
| Visibility (90%) |
     |
| General safety (90%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
 |
Rear tailgate step is a great idea, but could freeze up in winter
King Ranch option package is beginning to look dated
|
 |
If legs are a certain length, they can get sore if on the throttle for an hour or more
Left leg can hit the foot actuated parking brake when moving about on long trips
|
 |
Integrated Trailer Brake Controller
Ride quality in loaded, towing or empty situations is excellent
Very quiet inside
Back up camera has aiming device to aid in trailer hookup
|
|
Auto journalist & Consumer Ratings
Similar to 2009 Ford F-150 4x4 SuperCrew Long Bed
|