All 2010 Ford Taurus Experts' Reviews
|
Base MSRP
Brand new
$ 29,999 - 48,199
|
Avg Price
Used
$ 21,030
|
Review details
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (80%) |
  |
| Accessories (82%) |
|
| Space and Access (82%) |
|
| Comfort (80%) |
|
|
| Performance (76%) |
 |
| Driving Dynamics (77%) |
|
| Safety (77%) |
|
| General Appreciation (80%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
|
| Interior (90%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (90%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
|
| General ergonomics (80%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
|
| Sound system (80%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (90%) |
|
| Rear space and access (80%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
|
| Storage capacity (80%) |
|
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (70%) |
|
| Driving position (70%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
|
| Noise level (90%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Engine output (80%) |
|
| Transmission (70%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
|
| Handling (70%) |
|
| Braking (80%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (70%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (90%) |
|
| Visibility (90%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
 |
Rear visibility
Fuel consumption
|
 |
Front legroom
|
 |
Exterior styling
Ride and drive
Comfortable cabin
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (82%) |
|
| Accessories (86%) |
|
| Space and Access (80%) |
|
| Comfort (85%) |
|
|
| Performance (85%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics (72%) |
|
| Safety (82%) |
|
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
|
| Interior (90%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (90%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
|
| General ergonomics (80%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
|
| Sound system (80%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (90%) |
|
| Rear space and access (80%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
|
| Storage capacity (80%) |
|
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (70%) |
|
| Driving position (70%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
|
| Noise level (90%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
|
| Engine output (80%) |
|
| Transmission (70%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
|
| Handling (70%) |
|
| Braking (80%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (70%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (90%) |
|
| Visibility (90%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
|
Limited outward visibility
|
|
SHO isn't a bargain
V8-like fuel consumption
|
|
Straight-line performance
Impeccable interior fit and finish
Great sound system and SYNC
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (87%) |
|
| Accessories (82%) |
|
| Space and Access (75%) |
|
| Comfort (90%) |
|
|
| Performance (82%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics (77%) |
|
| Safety (82%) |
|
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
|
| Interior (90%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (90%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
|
| General ergonomics (80%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
|
| Sound system (80%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (90%) |
|
| Rear space and access (80%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
|
| Storage capacity (80%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (70%) |
|
| Driving position (70%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
|
| Noise level (90%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
|
| Engine output (80%) |
|
| Transmission (70%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
|
| Handling (70%) |
|
| Braking (80%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (70%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (90%) |
|
| Visibility (90%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
|
No trunk closer handle
No manual gearbox available
|
|
Surprisingly tight driver's side footwell
Sometimes fussy electronics
|
|
Excellent engine
Great relative mileage
Striking and unique style
Overall value
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (85%) |
|
| Accessories (80%) |
|
| Space and Access (76%) |
|
| Comfort (77%) |
|
|
| Performance (80%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics (72%) |
|
| Safety (77%) |
|
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
|
| Interior (90%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (90%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
|
| General ergonomics (80%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
|
| Sound system (80%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (90%) |
|
| Rear space and access (80%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
|
| Storage capacity (80%) |
|
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (70%) |
|
| Driving position (70%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
|
| Noise level (90%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
|
| Engine output (80%) |
|
| Transmission (70%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
|
| Handling (70%) |
|
| Braking (80%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (70%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (90%) |
|
| Visibility (90%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
|
Sadly expensive
|
|
Firm ride
Limited rearward vision
|
|
Best-looking domestic sedan to date
Outstanding cabin
Loveable EcoBoost engine
Athletic spirit
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (82%) |
|
| Accessories (82%) |
|
| Space and Access (82%) |
|
| Comfort (80%) |
|
|
| Performance (87%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics (80%) |
|
| Safety (85%) |
|
| General Appreciation (80%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
|
| Interior (90%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (90%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
|
| General ergonomics (80%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
|
| Sound system (80%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (90%) |
|
| Rear space and access (80%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
|
| Storage capacity (80%) |
|
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (70%) |
|
| Driving position (70%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
|
| Noise level (90%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
|
| Engine output (80%) |
|
| Transmission (70%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
|
| Handling (70%) |
|
| Braking (80%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (70%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (90%) |
|
| Visibility (90%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
|
Hard to distinguish from regular Taurus
Steering too assisted
|
|
Quite large
Bland design
Car feels heavy at times
|
|
Powerful engine
No turbo lag
Fit and finish
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (82%) |
|
| Accessories (82%) |
|
| Space and Access (82%) |
|
| Comfort (77%) |
|
|
| Performance (72%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics (75%) |
|
| Safety (85%) |
|
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
|
| Interior (90%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (90%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
|
| General ergonomics (80%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
|
| Sound system (80%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (90%) |
|
| Rear space and access (80%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
|
| Storage capacity (80%) |
|
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (70%) |
|
| Driving position (70%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
|
| Noise level (90%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
|
| Engine output (80%) |
|
| Transmission (70%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
|
| Handling (70%) |
|
| Braking (80%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (70%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (90%) |
|
| Visibility (90%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
|
Occasionally ponderous steering system
Slow transmission in manual mode
|
|
More sedate style than expected
Large size
Lack of seat support
|
|
High-class finish
Good soundproofing
Lots of technological goodies
|
|
Auto journalist & Consumer Ratings
Similar to 2010 Ford Taurus
|
