All 2012 Honda CR-V Experts' Reviews
|
Base MSRP
Brand new
$ 25,990 - 35,090
|
Avg Price
Used
$ 28,656
|
Review details
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (82%) |
  |
| Accessories (80%) |
|
| Space and Access (82%) |
|
| Comfort (85%) |
|
|
| Performance (82%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics (87%) |
|
| Safety (87%) |
|
| General Appreciation (80%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (90%) |
 |
| Interior (80%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (70%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
|
| General ergonomics (80%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
|
| Sound system (70%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
|
| Rear space and access (80%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
|
| Storage capacity (80%) |
|
| Access to mechanical components (70%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
|
| Driving position (80%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
|
| Noise level (80%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
|
| Engine output (70%) |
|
| Transmission (70%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (80%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
|
| Handling (80%) |
|
| Braking (80%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (70%) |
|
| Visibility (80%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
|
|
 |
Passenger seat could use more adjustability
|
 |
Conservative styling
Adequate performance
Five-speed auto could use another gear at times
|
 |
Very comfortable driver's seat
Good mirrors
Space utiliztion is very good
Good entry and exit to all seats
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (82%) |
|
| Accessories (86%) |
|
| Space and Access (90%) |
|
| Comfort (87%) |
|
|
| Performance (75%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics (77%) |
|
| Safety (90%) |
|
| General Appreciation (70%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (90%) |
|
| Interior (80%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (70%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
|
| General ergonomics (80%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
|
| Sound system (70%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
|
| Rear space and access (80%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
|
| Storage capacity (80%) |
|
| Access to mechanical components (70%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
|
| Driving position (80%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
|
| Noise level (80%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
|
| Engine output (70%) |
|
| Transmission (70%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (80%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
|
| Handling (80%) |
|
| Braking (80%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (70%) |
|
| Visibility (80%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
|
|
|
No red lights
|
|
Looks like the old CR-V
Slightly less max cargo space
|
|
Spacious interior
Decent fuel economy
Improved AWD system
Undeniable versatility
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (80%) |
|
| Accessories (78%) |
|
| Space and Access (78%) |
|
| Comfort (80%) |
|
|
| Performance (72%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics (80%) |
|
| Safety (77%) |
|
| General Appreciation (80%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (90%) |
|
| Interior (80%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (70%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
|
| General ergonomics (80%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
|
| Sound system (70%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
|
| Rear space and access (80%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
|
| Storage capacity (80%) |
|
| Access to mechanical components (70%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
|
| Driving position (80%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
|
| Noise level (80%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
|
| Engine output (70%) |
|
| Transmission (70%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (80%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
|
| Handling (80%) |
|
| Braking (80%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (70%) |
|
| Visibility (80%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
|
|
|
Must step up to AWD to reap true benefits of the 2012 model
|
|
Interior plastics could be improved somewhat
|
|
More stylish
Economical as always
Improved AWD system
|
|
Auto journalist & Consumer Ratings
Similar to 2012 Honda CR-V
|
