All 2011 Honda Pilot Experts' Reviews
|
Base MSRP
Brand new
$ 34,820 - 48,420
|
Avg Price
Used
$ 35,697
|
Review details
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (77%) |
     |
| Accessories (84%) |
     |
| Space and Access (84%) |
     |
| Comfort (82%) |
     |
|
| Performance (80%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (80%) |
     |
| Safety (87%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
     |
| Interior (80%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (70%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (70%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (70%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (70%) |
     |
| Sound system (70%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (70%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (70%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (80%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (70%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (70%) |
     |
| Noise level (70%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
     |
| Engine output (70%) |
     |
| Transmission (60%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (70%) |
     |
| Braking (70%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
     |
| Mirrors (80%) |
     |
| Visibility (70%) |
     |
| General safety (80%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (70%) |
     |
|
 |
None
|
 |
Plasticky dash
Steering could be more communicative
|
 |
Room for 8 adults
Easy to park
Reasonable fuel economy
|
|
|
2011 Honda Pilot EX-L
|
|
|
By Rob Rothwell
Saturday, March 05, 2011
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (72%) |
     |
| Accessories (76%) |
     |
| Space and Access (70%) |
     |
| Comfort (72%) |
     |
|
| Performance (62%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (75%) |
     |
| Safety (75%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
     |
| Interior (80%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (70%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (70%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (70%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (70%) |
     |
| Sound system (70%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (70%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (70%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (80%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (70%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (70%) |
     |
| Noise level (70%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
     |
| Engine output (70%) |
     |
| Transmission (60%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (70%) |
     |
| Braking (70%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
     |
| Mirrors (80%) |
     |
| Visibility (70%) |
     |
| General safety (80%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (70%) |
     |
|
 |
None
|
 |
Fuel economy doesn't meet rating
No electronic manual mode transmission function
Engine gets growly under pressure
|
 |
Refined operation
Uncomplicated to use and understand
Reasonably economical
Attractive styling
value
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (75%) |
     |
| Accessories (72%) |
     |
| Space and Access (74%) |
     |
| Comfort (75%) |
     |
|
| Performance (67%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (75%) |
     |
| Safety (77%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (70%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
     |
| Interior (80%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (70%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (70%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (70%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (70%) |
     |
| Sound system (70%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (70%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (70%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (80%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (70%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (70%) |
     |
| Noise level (70%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
     |
| Engine output (70%) |
     |
| Transmission (60%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (70%) |
     |
| Braking (70%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
     |
| Mirrors (80%) |
     |
| Visibility (70%) |
     |
| General safety (80%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (70%) |
     |
|
 |
None
|
 |
5-speed autobox
No electronic manual-mode shift function
Didn't achieve posted fuel economy
|
 |
Highly functional vehicle for active family
Seats eight
Car-like ease of operation
Plenty of room
Comfortable driving dynamics
|
|
Auto journalist & Consumer Ratings
|
|
Consumer Rating
n/a
(0 ratings)
|
Similar to 2011 Honda Pilot
|