All 2009 Honda Ridgeline Experts' Reviews
|
Base MSRP
Brand new
$ 34,990 - 43,490
|
Avg Price
Used
$ 21,233
|
Review details
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (75%) |
     |
| Accessories (80%) |
     |
| Space and Access (80%) |
     |
| Comfort (82%) |
     |
|
| Performance (75%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (80%) |
     |
| Safety (77%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
     |
| Interior (70%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (70%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (70%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (90%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (90%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (90%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (100%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (n/a) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
     |
| Noise level (80%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (80%) |
     |
| Engine output (80%) |
     |
| Transmission (70%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (80%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (90%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
     |
| Mirrors (n/a) |
|
| Visibility (70%) |
     |
| General safety (80%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (70%) |
     |
|
 |
Truck box cargo compartment freezes shut in winter
Poor rearward side visibility
|
 |
Interior needs restyling
Dash needs updating
Short box makes Ridgeline more useful in town than as a "work" truck
|
 |
AWD package works well
Front seats are very comfortable
Box tie downs and cleats are well thought out and very useful
Dual action tailgate is very convenient
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (77%) |
     |
| Accessories (80%) |
     |
| Space and Access (88%) |
     |
| Comfort (82%) |
     |
|
| Performance (77%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (77%) |
     |
| Safety (85%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
     |
| Interior (70%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (70%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (70%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (90%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (90%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (90%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (100%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (n/a) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
     |
| Noise level (80%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (80%) |
     |
| Engine output (80%) |
     |
| Transmission (70%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (80%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (90%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
     |
| Mirrors (n/a) |
|
| Visibility (70%) |
     |
| General safety (80%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (70%) |
     |
|
 |
High price
|
 |
Have to like its looks
Towing capacity not as good as competition
|
 |
Powerful engine
Good payload capacity
Practical storage possibilities
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (77%) |
     |
| Accessories (78%) |
     |
| Space and Access (92%) |
     |
| Comfort (80%) |
     |
|
| Performance (77%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (82%) |
     |
| Safety (76%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (70%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
     |
| Interior (70%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (70%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (70%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (90%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (90%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (90%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (100%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
     |
| Noise level (80%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (80%) |
     |
| Engine output (80%) |
     |
| Transmission (70%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (80%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (90%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
     |
| Visibility (70%) |
     |
| General safety (80%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (70%) |
     |
|
 |
Needs a full-sized spare
|
 |
No up-sized engine option
Can feel too car-like off road
|
 |
Comfortable and car-like driving experience and ride
Decent highway mileage
Very flexible and versatile
Ready for off-road action as required
|
|
Auto journalist & Consumer Ratings
Similar to 2009 Honda Ridgeline
|