All 2011 Lexus CT 200h Experts' Reviews
|
Base MSRP
Brand new
$ 30,950 - 30,950
|
|
Review details
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (82%) |
     |
| Accessories (76%) |
     |
| Space and Access (78%) |
     |
| Comfort (82%) |
     |
|
| Performance (80%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (80%) |
     |
| Safety (80%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
     |
| Interior (70%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (70%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (70%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (70%) |
     |
| Sound system (80%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (70%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (70%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (60%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (70%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
     |
| Noise level (80%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (60%) |
     |
| Engine output (60%) |
     |
| Transmission (70%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (70%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
     |
| Mirrors (70%) |
     |
| Visibility (70%) |
     |
| General safety (80%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
 |
No red lights
|
 |
Throttle can lag in Eco mode, but nothing excessive
|
 |
Fuel economy
Most comfortable seats ever
It drives like a non-hybrid car
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (82%) |
     |
| Accessories (80%) |
     |
| Space and Access (72%) |
     |
| Comfort (85%) |
     |
|
| Performance (75%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (77%) |
     |
| Safety (80%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
     |
| Interior (70%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (70%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (70%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (70%) |
     |
| Sound system (80%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (70%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (70%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (60%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (70%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
     |
| Noise level (80%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (60%) |
     |
| Engine output (60%) |
     |
| Transmission (70%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (70%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
     |
| Mirrors (70%) |
     |
| Visibility (70%) |
     |
| General safety (80%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
 |
No red lights
|
 |
Underpowered for a car presented as sporty
|
 |
Great eye-catching style
Comfortable
Good fuel economy
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (75%) |
     |
| Accessories (74%) |
     |
| Space and Access (72%) |
     |
| Comfort (77%) |
     |
|
| Performance (65%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (77%) |
     |
| Safety (75%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
     |
| Interior (70%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (70%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (70%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (70%) |
     |
| Sound system (80%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (70%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (70%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (60%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (70%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
     |
| Noise level (80%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (60%) |
     |
| Engine output (60%) |
     |
| Transmission (70%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (70%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (70%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
     |
| Mirrors (70%) |
     |
| Visibility (70%) |
     |
| General safety (80%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
 |
None
|
 |
Blasé highway performance
Tight squeeze for five
|
 |
Quiet, refined hybrid operation
Comfortable front seats
Rewarding handling dynamics combined with absorbent ride quality
Practicality, frugality and value
|
|
Auto journalist & Consumer Ratings
|
|
Consumer Rating
n/a
(0 ratings)
|
Similar to 2011 Lexus CT 200h
|