All 2013 Mazda CX-5 Experts' Reviews
|
Base MSRP
Brand new
$ 22,995 - 32,750
|
|
Review details
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (85%) |
  |
| Accessories (84%) |
|
| Space and Access (72%) |
 |
| Comfort (67%) |
|
|
| Performance (82%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics (85%) |
|
| Safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation (80%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
|
| Interior (90%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (90%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (90%) |
|
| General ergonomics (90%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
|
| Sound system (80%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
|
| Rear space and access (80%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
|
| Storage capacity (80%) |
|
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (90%) |
|
| Driving position (90%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
|
| Noise level (80%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (80%) |
|
| Engine output (80%) |
|
| Transmission (80%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (80%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
|
| Handling (90%) |
|
| Braking (80%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (90%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (80%) |
|
| Visibility (80%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
 |
No red lights
|
 |
Terribly harsh ride
Noisy
|
 |
Great styling
Handsome cabin
Fuel consumption
Road handling
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (85%) |
|
| Accessories (86%) |
|
| Space and Access (80%) |
|
| Comfort (85%) |
|
|
| Performance (80%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics (85%) |
|
| Safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
|
| Interior (90%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (90%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (90%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (90%) |
|
| General ergonomics (90%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
|
| Sound system (80%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
|
| Rear space and access (80%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
|
| Storage capacity (80%) |
|
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (90%) |
|
| Driving position (90%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
|
| Noise level (80%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (80%) |
|
| Engine output (80%) |
|
| Transmission (80%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (80%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
|
| Handling (90%) |
|
| Braking (80%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (90%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (80%) |
|
| Visibility (80%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
|
|
|
No red lights
|
|
Price-wise again, the real deals are in the low to mid range
A tad more power would make this vehicle even more fun
|
|
A stylish & playful compact SUV
Competitively priced
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (75%) |
|
| Accessories (76%) |
|
| Space and Access (80%) |
|
| Comfort (80%) |
|
|
| Performance (75%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics (90%) |
|
| Safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation (80%) |
|
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
|
| Interior (70%) |
|
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
|
| Interior Fit and Finish (70%) |
|
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
|
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
|
| General ergonomics (80%) |
|
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (70%) |
|
| Sound system (70%) |
|
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
|
| Rear space and access (80%) |
|
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
|
| Storage capacity (80%) |
|
| Access to mechanical components (80%) |
|
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
|
| Driving position (80%) |
|
| Suspension and ride (90%) |
|
| Noise level (70%) |
|
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
|
| Engine output (70%) |
|
| Transmission (70%) |
|
| Fuel consumption (90%) |
|
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (90%) |
|
| Handling (90%) |
|
| Braking (90%) |
|
| Manoeuvrability (90%) |
|
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (80%) |
|
| Mirrors (80%) |
|
| Visibility (80%) |
|
| General safety (80%) |
|
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
|
|
|
No red lights
|
|
A little underpowered
|
|
Great handling
Steers like a roadster
Versatile
Great fuel economy
|
|
Auto journalist & Consumer Ratings
Similar to 2013 Mazda CX-5
|
