All 2009 Subaru Forester Experts' Reviews
|
Base MSRP
Brand new
$ 25,795 - 34,895
|
Avg Price
Used
$ 16,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I Say
76 %
(2.5X Touring)
|
I Say
82 %
(2.5X Limited)
|
Review details
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (77%) |
     |
| Accessories (86%) |
     |
| Space and Access (82%) |
     |
| Comfort (85%) |
     |
|
| Performance (77%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (82%) |
     |
| Safety (87%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
     |
| Interior (80%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (90%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (70%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (60%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (70%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (80%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (80%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (90%) |
     |
| Noise level (90%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (60%) |
     |
| Engine output (60%) |
     |
| Transmission (70%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (80%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (90%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (90%) |
     |
| Mirrors (90%) |
     |
| Visibility (90%) |
     |
| General safety (100%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
 |
No red lights
|
 |
Automatic transmission could use a few more gears
Some drivers may wish for more thigh support
|
 |
Visibility
Stable all wheel drive winter handling
Safe and solid
Heats up fast
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (80%) |
     |
| Accessories (70%) |
     |
| Space and Access (78%) |
     |
| Comfort (75%) |
     |
|
| Performance (72%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (77%) |
     |
| Safety (77%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
     |
| Interior (80%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (90%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (70%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (60%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (70%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (80%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (80%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (90%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (90%) |
     |
| Noise level (90%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (60%) |
     |
| Engine output (60%) |
     |
| Transmission (70%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (80%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (90%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (90%) |
     |
| Mirrors (90%) |
     |
| Visibility (90%) |
     |
| General safety (100%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
 |
None
|
 |
High door sill
Ordinary styling
|
 |
Spacious interior
Good rear visibility
Excellent AWD system
Large hatch opening
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (85%) |
     |
| Accessories (84%) |
     |
| Space and Access (82%) |
     |
| Comfort (87%) |
     |
|
| Performance (72%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (80%) |
     |
| Safety (85%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
     |
| Interior (80%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (90%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (70%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (60%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (70%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (80%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (80%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (90%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (90%) |
     |
| Noise level (90%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (60%) |
     |
| Engine output (60%) |
     |
| Transmission (70%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (80%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (90%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (90%) |
     |
| Mirrors (90%) |
     |
| Visibility (90%) |
     |
| General safety (100%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
 |
None
|
 |
Needs a 5th gear
Heated seat switches hard to access
Limited model isn't cheap
|
 |
Excellent ride and comfort
Versatility
Looks much better
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (80%) |
     |
| Accessories (74%) |
     |
| Space and Access (80%) |
     |
| Comfort (85%) |
     |
|
| Performance (67%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (82%) |
     |
| Safety (92%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (70%) |
     |
| Interior (80%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (90%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (80%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (70%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (60%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (70%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (80%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (80%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (80%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (90%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (90%) |
     |
| Noise level (90%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (60%) |
     |
| Engine output (60%) |
     |
| Transmission (70%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (80%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (90%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (90%) |
     |
| Mirrors (90%) |
     |
| Visibility (90%) |
     |
| General safety (100%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
 |
None
|
 |
Tepid performance from the base engine
4-speed automatic seems dated
|
 |
Improved styling
Improved operational refinement
Comprehensive safety and occupant protection
Capable all-wheel-drive system
|
|
Auto journalist & Consumer Ratings
Similar to 2009 Subaru Forester
|