All 2012 Toyota Camry Experts' Reviews
|
Base MSRP
Brand new
$ 23,700 - 33,700
|
Avg Price
Used
$ 23,250
|
Review details
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (82%) |
     |
| Accessories (80%) |
     |
| Space and Access (76%) |
     |
| Comfort (82%) |
     |
|
| Performance (82%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (85%) |
     |
| Safety (82%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
     |
| Interior (80%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (90%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (90%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (90%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (90%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (80%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (90%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (90%) |
     |
| Noise level (90%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
     |
| Engine output (80%) |
     |
| Transmission (80%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (90%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (90%) |
     |
| Mirrors (80%) |
     |
| Visibility (80%) |
     |
| General safety (90%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
 |
Camry design has been too plain for too long
|
 |
Even dressed up, the Camry is plain
Battery pack eats up a fair amount of trunk space
|
 |
Good overall comfort
Better performance than expected
Improved fuel economy
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (77%) |
     |
| Accessories (82%) |
     |
| Space and Access (80%) |
     |
| Comfort (82%) |
     |
|
| Performance (87%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (82%) |
     |
| Safety (80%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
     |
| Interior (80%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (90%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (90%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (90%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (90%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (80%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (90%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (90%) |
     |
| Noise level (90%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
     |
| Engine output (80%) |
     |
| Transmission (80%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (90%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (90%) |
     |
| Mirrors (80%) |
     |
| Visibility (80%) |
     |
| General safety (90%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
 |
No red lights
|
 |
Seats could be better
Rear-end treatment
|
 |
Refined
Quiet and solid
Good powertrain
Impressive drive
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (82%) |
     |
| Accessories (76%) |
     |
| Space and Access (84%) |
     |
| Comfort (82%) |
     |
|
| Performance (77%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (80%) |
     |
| Safety (85%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
     |
| Interior (80%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (90%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (90%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (90%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (90%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (80%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (90%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (90%) |
     |
| Noise level (90%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
     |
| Engine output (80%) |
     |
| Transmission (80%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (90%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (90%) |
     |
| Mirrors (80%) |
     |
| Visibility (80%) |
     |
| General safety (90%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
 |
Manual-adjust front passenger seat mounted too high
|
 |
CVT automatic transmission masks performance
LE trim gets cheapest radio in Camry line
|
 |
Great fuel economy
Smooth and quiet
Improved steering feel
|
| Summary Rating: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (82%) |
     |
| Accessories (82%) |
     |
| Space and Access (86%) |
     |
| Comfort (85%) |
     |
|
| Performance (80%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (80%) |
     |
| Safety (85%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (80%) |
     |
| Interior (80%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (80%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (90%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (80%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (80%) |
     |
| Sound system (90%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (80%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (90%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (90%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (80%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (90%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (80%) |
     |
| Driving position (80%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (90%) |
     |
| Noise level (90%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
     |
| Engine output (80%) |
     |
| Transmission (80%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (90%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (80%) |
     |
| Handling (80%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (80%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (90%) |
     |
| Mirrors (80%) |
     |
| Visibility (80%) |
     |
| General safety (90%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (90%) |
     |
|
 |
Manual-adjust front passenger seat mounted too high
|
 |
LE and XLE suspension still a little too cushy
|
 |
Vastly improved interior quality
Lower fuel consumption
Much better steering feel
|
|
Auto journalist & Consumer Ratings
Similar to 2012 Toyota Camry
|