Évaluations consommateurs : Toyota Matrix 2003
| Évaluation détaillée: |
Détaillée |
| Esthétique (80%) |
     |
| Accessoires (80%) |
     |
| Espace et accès (92%) |
     |
| Confort (80%) |
     |
| Comportement routier (80%) |
     |
| Moteur et transmission (60%) |
     |
| Sécurité (85%) |
     |
| Esthétique (86%) |
     |
|
| Accessoires (83%) |
     |
| Espace et accès (90%) |
     |
| Confort (79%) |
     |
| Performance (73%) |
     |
| Dynamique de conduite (78%) |
     |
| Sécurité (78%) |
     |
| Appréciation générale (85%) |
     |
|
| Esthétique |
| Extérieure (100%) |
     |
| Intérieure (60%) |
     |
| Finition extérieure (100%) |
     |
| Finition intérieure (60%) |
     |
| Accessoires |
| Commodités et équipements (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation et commandes (80%) |
     |
| Ergonomie générale (80%) |
     |
| Ventilation/chauffage/climatisation (100%) |
     |
| Système audio (60%) |
     |
| Espace et accès |
| Accès et espace avant (100%) |
     |
| Accès et espace arrière (60%) |
     |
| Accès et volume du coffre (100%) |
     |
| Espace de rangement (100%) |
     |
| Accessibilité mécanique (100%) |
     |
| Confort |
| Sièges (100%) |
     |
| Position de conduite (100%) |
     |
| Suspension (80%) |
     |
| Insonorisation (40%) |
     |
| Comportement routier |
| Direction (80%) |
     |
| Tenue de route (80%) |
     |
| Freinage (80%) |
     |
| Moteur et transmission |
| Rendement général (80%) |
     |
| Accélération (80%) |
     |
| Reprise (60%) |
     |
| Sélecteur de vitesses (40%) |
     |
| Passage de vitesses (40%) |
     |
| Sécurité |
| Sacs gonflables (80%) |
     |
| Antipatinage / stabilité électronique (80%) |
     |
| Rétroviseurs (80%) |
     |
| Visibilité (100%) |
     |
| Esthétique |
| Extérieur (82%) |
     |
| Intérieur (82%) |
     |
| Finition / assemblage extérieur (88%) |
     |
| Finition / assemblage intérieur (91%) |
     |
|
| Accessoires |
| Commodités et équipement (85%) |
     |
| Instrumentation et commandes (82%) |
     |
| Ergonomie générale (85%) |
     |
| Chauffage / ventilation / climatisation (85%) |
     |
| Système audio (77%) |
     |
| Espace et accès |
| Espace / accès à l'avant (94%) |
     |
| Espace / accès à l'arrière (85%) |
     |
| Espace de chargement et accès (94%) |
     |
| Capacité de rangement (100%) |
     |
| Accès aux composantes mécaniques (80%) |
     |
| Confort |
| Sièges (82%) |
     |
| Position de conduite (88%) |
     |
| Suspension / roulement (74%) |
     |
| Niveau sonore (71%) |
     |
| Performance |
| Accélération (57%) |
     |
| Rendement du moteur (71%) |
     |
| Transmission (77%) |
     |
| Consommation d'essence (88%) |
     |
| Dynamique de conduite |
| Direction (82%) |
     |
| Tenue de route (80%) |
     |
| Freinage (71%) |
     |
| Maniabilité (80%) |
     |
| Sécurité |
| Antipatinage et contrôle de la stabilité (56%) |
     |
| Rétroviseurs (85%) |
     |
| Visibilité (85%) |
     |
| Sécurité en général (82%) |
     |
| Appréciation générale |
| Appréciation générale (85%) |
     |
|
Évaluations clients
Par woohoo!
mercredi, 22 septembre 2004
|
|
| Évaluation détaillée: |
Évaluation complète |
| Esthétique (80%) |
     |
| Accessoires (80%) |
     |
| Espace et accès (92%) |
     |
| Confort (80%) |
     |
|
| Comportement routier (80%) |
     |
| Moteur et transmission (60%) |
     |
| Sécurité (85%) |
     |
|
| Esthétique |
| Extérieure (100%) |
     |
| Intérieure (60%) |
     |
| Finition extérieure (100%) |
     |
| Finition intérieure (60%) |
     |
| Accessoires |
| Commodités et équipements (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation et commandes (80%) |
     |
| Ergonomie générale (80%) |
     |
| Ventilation/chauffage/climatisation (100%) |
     |
| Système audio (60%) |
     |
| Espace et accès |
| Accès et espace avant (100%) |
     |
| Accès et espace arrière (60%) |
     |
| Accès et volume du coffre (100%) |
     |
| Espace de rangement (100%) |
     |
| Accessibilité mécanique (100%) |
     |
| Confort |
| Sièges (100%) |
     |
| Position de conduite (100%) |
     |
| Suspension (80%) |
     |
| Insonorisation (40%) |
     |
|
| Comportement routier |
| Direction (80%) |
     |
| Tenue de route (80%) |
     |
| Freinage (80%) |
     |
| Moteur et transmission |
| Rendement général (80%) |
     |
| Accélération (80%) |
     |
| Reprise (60%) |
     |
| Sélecteur de vitesses (40%) |
     |
| Passage de vitesses (40%) |
     |
| Sécurité |
| Sacs gonflables (80%) |
     |
| Antipatinage / stabilité électronique (80%) |
     |
| Rétroviseurs (80%) |
     |
| Visibilité (100%) |
     |
|
Évaluation:
Could this be the perfect vehicle? It's not that expensive (around 25K for an XRS), it's powerful, it's very spacious, it has the fuel consumption of a Corolla, the insurance rates are low (the more doors the better), what could you want more?
Acceleration is very good with its 180 horsepower, but you have to rev the engine very high to extract that power. In normal driving, the XRS engine acts as any other Matrix. The shifter is a bit clunky, not as precise as a Honda shifter. With the 17-inch low-profile tires, it's a little stiff over bumps, but handling is very good for a tall vehicle.
It is so practical--who needs a minivan? I wish there was a little more space in the rear for the baby seat, it's a tight fit, but besides that there's room to spare. The rear seats fold completely flat, and the doors are large permitting easy access. You don't crouch down getting in this car, you just lean your butt in, and that's it. There's a good view of the road ahead, and surprisingly, the view out back isn't bad either. The dash and door panels could use some nicer plastic instead of the rock-hard grainy surface that's in there, but it gets the job done.
The CD/cassette player sounds pretty good, but this Delco unit (read: GM) gets VERY HOT after a little while. Fortunately, 2005 models get a Toyota radio.
I wish there was a sunroof, though, it wasn't available on 2003 models I think.
A great car and I'm happy with my purchase.
6 sur 7 ont trouvé cette évaluation utile.
|
Évaluations Experts Auto123 & Consommateurs
Comparable à Toyota Matrix 2003
|