Bien oui, je l'ai lu a 9:30 :roll: , penses-tu que tu m'en apprend...Citation:
Envoyé par dedemo
EN plus de ca, trouve moi une ligne qui mentionne qui vont vendre la filiale!! Trouve moi ca!!
Version imprimable
Bien oui, je l'ai lu a 9:30 :roll: , penses-tu que tu m'en apprend...Citation:
Envoyé par dedemo
EN plus de ca, trouve moi une ligne qui mentionne qui vont vendre la filiale!! Trouve moi ca!!
Chrysler serait très intéressant pour le manufacturier chinois Chery, il ferait toute une percée en Amérique du Nord en plus d'acquérir une expertise, des brevets, des usines prêtent à la production de masse...
Inquiètez-vous pas ça viendra, Chery tourne autour de Chrysler, Ford et GM comme un requin autour d'une pièce de viande dont le sang s'écoule. Il serait capable d'en acheter un des trois "with cash money"!Citation:
Envoyé par coco27
Y parle pour rien encore :roll:Citation:
Envoyé par dedemo
A la limite, pourquoi pas que Dailmer ferait comme bombardier, vendre leur filiale qui va le mieux pour avoir plus d'argent....car Bombardier a bien vendu sa filiale recreative, qui etait en meilleure sante, que leur divion avionique.
j'ai repéré cet article sur un aute forum
http://www.forbes.com/2007/02/14/chr...rtner=yahootix
Citation:
DETROIT - DaimlerChrysler Chief Executive Dieter Zetsche, under enormous pressure in Germany to spin off the money-losing Chrysler Group, says all options for the U.S. auto making arm are now on the table.
The surprise statement overshadowed details of Chrysler's three-year, $4.5 billion recovery plan announced Wednesday that includes 13,000 job cuts.
Attention immediately shifted to who, if anyone, might be interested in Chrysler. A German magazine reported that DaimlerChrysler (nyse: DCX - news - people ) was in talks to sell its Chrysler unit to General Motors (nyse: GM - news - people ), but officials declined to comment. "I cannot and will not go into any further details," Zetsche told reporters in Detroit.
Carlos Ghosn, chief executive of France's Renault (other-otc: RNSDF - news - people ) and Japan's Nissan (nasdaq: NSANY - news - people ), has made known his desire to add a North American partner to that global alliance. But after talks with GM broke down earlier this year, he played down that ambition. When asked about future alliances during a Renault press conference on Feb. 8, Ghosn said both companies needed to focus on their own challenges. "Is that in general terms a good idea? Yes, I believe it is a good idea, because we are thinking in terms of synergies that we have measured," he said. "However, at this stage we are not moving on."
On Wednesday, Ghosn reiterated that position. "We remain open to extending the alliance, but we have no plans to pursue that at this time. Nissan is focused on its own challenges and performance."
But the pressure on Zetsche to shed Chrysler is intense. Over the weekend, a DaimlerChrysler shareholder told a German newspaper, "This needs to be an option that must be examined again and again." DWS fund manager Henning Gebhardt compared a potential DaimlerChrysler breakup to BMW's sale of Rover: "It would be irresponsible for [Daimler] management to exclude this option." DWS, Germany's largest fund company, owns less than 1% of DaimlerChrysler shares.
By putting Chrysler in play, Zetsche bought himself some time to try to fix the struggling Chrysler. And his surprise announcement managed to deflect pressure onto the United Auto Workers union, which has been none too cooperative with Chrysler in recent months. The union has refused to give Chrysler the same health care concessions it gave General Motors and Ford Motor (nyse: F - news - people ), for instance, because of the deep pockets of its German parent company. With bargaining on a new national contract set to begin later this year, Zetsche's message to the UAW was clear: Accept new terms, or Chrysler could be sold.
Zetsche doesn't seem all that eager to shed Chrysler, a company he successfully turned around earlier this decade. In fact, he has said so on several recent occasions. Other senior managers in Germany support his position, say company sources.
The problem, these sources say, is that nine years after the marriage between Daimler-Benz and Chrysler, mid-level managers at Mercedes are still resisting any collaboration that could sully the luxury brand's image. That has made it difficult to achieve the level of synergies promised in 1998.
Chrysler Group President Thomas LaSorda said the recovery plan outlined Wednesday would solidify Chrysler's position in the North American market while laying the foundation for a new business model that would stress global growth and a shift to more fuel-efficient models. The plan calls for a return to profitability by 2008 and a 2.5% return on sales by 2009. Chrysler lost $1.5 billion in 2006, while DaimlerChrysler overall earned $7.3 billion.
In all, Chrysler said it would eliminate 13,000 jobs, or 16% of its workforce, including 11,000 in the U.S. and 2,000 in Canada. In the U.S., 2,000 white-collar jobs would be cut, along with 9,000 UAW jobs. It will shut an assembly plant in Newark, Del., that makes large SUVs, and a parts distribution center in Ohio. Eliminating shifts at two other truck plants in Michigan and Missouri will help reduce production capacity by 400,000 units, the company said.
Meanwhile, Chrysler said it would launch 20 all-new vehicles, and 13 refreshed products, between now and 2009. It also will invest $3 billion in new engines, transmissions and axles in a bid to develop more fuel-efficient cars and trucks. At the same time, it intends to eliminate 70,000 low-margin rental car sales, which should help profits.
Rising costs for raw materials like steel and plastic are one reason Chrysler and other automakers had a tough year in 2006. Nevertheless, Chrysler said its aim is to cut material costs by $1.5 billion by 2009.
Longer term, Chrysler said it wants to expand outside of North America, where 90% of its sales currently are based, and make more use of global partnerships. It recently announced an agreement in principle with China's Chery Automobile Company, for instance, to develop a small car for sale in North America and Western Europe.
Indeed, an alliance or partnership, rather than an outright sale, might be what Zetsche has in mind for Chrysler. The company, he said, is "looking into further strategic options with partners" that would accelerate Chrysler's recovery.
Le problème c'est qu'avec une multinational comme Mercedes, tout peut arrivé. Surtout si Chrysler ne fait pas d'argent bientôt. C'est claire qu'il ne garderons pas une cie déficitaire.
L'entente avec Chery (Chine) pourrais elle être plus que pour une petite voiture?
L'avenir nous le dira mais il est clair que certaines compagnies chinoises (qui sont milliardaires plusieurs fois) ont les 3 grands à l'oeil et ne lèveront pas le nez sur aucune transaction qui leur serait rentable. Arrêtez de croire que des compagnies peuvent déclarer des milliards en déficit années après années sans que rien n'arrive. Les gens d'Olymel croyait la même chose jusqu'à hier, la réalité les a pourtant rejoint.Citation:
Envoyé par IanD
Les millions de véhicules de Ford en inventaire sur des stationnements un peu partout prouvent que la re-structuration ne marche pas. Quel sera le prochain move tu crois? Ils ont déjà tout donner leur actifs en garantie, même leur logo!
Ca fait trois semaines qu'ils on présenter leur plans, laisse le temps... en tout cas, aussi bien pas s'obstiner avec toi, tu est assez pour la disparition des trois grands que tu vois en couleurs :roll:Citation:
Envoyé par dedemo
Les 3 grands ne feront pas failittes. Ils formeront des joint-venture avec soit des compagnies américaines ou japonnaises. Ils seront moins grosses mais plus performantes. Le niaisage d'avoir 2 dealer dans la même ville pour les même produits clonés, ça achève drôlement, même chez GM qui était les maîtres incontestés des concessions multiples!!! Il y a une différence entre être réaliste et fermer les yeux comme tu le fais. J'espère que les dirigeants de ta compagnie voit plus clair que toi! :wink: