2012 Volvo C70 Ratings
| Detailed Ratings: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (100%) |
     |
| Accessories (84%) |
     |
| Space and Access (58%) |
     |
| Comfort (85%) |
     |
|
| Performance (62%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (70%) |
     |
| Safety (97%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (100%) |
     |
| Interior (100%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (100%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (100%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (90%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (90%) |
     |
| Sound system (80%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (70%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (50%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (40%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (40%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (90%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (90%) |
     |
| Driving position (90%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
     |
| Noise level (80%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
     |
| Engine output (60%) |
     |
| Transmission (60%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (60%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (70%) |
     |
| Handling (60%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (70%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (100%) |
     |
| Mirrors (100%) |
     |
| Visibility (90%) |
     |
| General safety (100%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
Customer Ratings
By pine8
Friday, March 09, 2012
|
|
| Detailed Ratings: |
Complete Rating |
| Styling (100%) |
     |
| Accessories (88%) |
     |
| Space and Access (64%) |
     |
| Comfort (95%) |
     |
|
| Performance (60%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics (70%) |
     |
| Safety (95%) |
     |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
| Styling |
| Exterior (100%) |
     |
| Interior (100%) |
     |
| Exterior fit and finish (100%) |
     |
| Interior Fit and Finish (100%) |
     |
| Accessories |
| Convenience and equipment (80%) |
     |
| Instrumentation and controls (80%) |
     |
| General ergonomics (90%) |
     |
| Heating / ventilation / air conditioning (90%) |
     |
| Sound system (80%) |
     |
| Space and Access |
| Front space and access (70%) |
     |
| Rear space and access (50%) |
     |
| Cargo space and access (40%) |
     |
| Storage capacity (40%) |
     |
| Access to mechanical components (90%) |
     |
| Comfort |
| Seats (90%) |
     |
| Driving position (90%) |
     |
| Suspension and ride (80%) |
     |
| Noise level (80%) |
     |
|
| Performance |
| Acceleration (70%) |
     |
| Engine output (60%) |
     |
| Transmission (60%) |
     |
| Fuel consumption (60%) |
     |
| Driving Dynamics |
| Steering (70%) |
     |
| Handling (60%) |
     |
| Braking (80%) |
     |
| Manoeuvrability (70%) |
     |
| Safety |
| Traction and stability control (100%) |
     |
| Mirrors (100%) |
     |
| Visibility (90%) |
     |
| General safety (100%) |
     |
| General Appreciation |
| General Appreciation (80%) |
     |
|
 |
Red Light
Bluetooth just average (Hands free)
|
 |
Yellow Light
Large turning circle
|
 |
Green Light
Best all around luxury usable convertible, that 's front wheel drive A MUST FOR CANADA!
|
Review:
BMW, LEXUS and Infiniti Luxury Hardtop convertibles are the major competitors to the Volvo C-70 about same size all being rear wheel drive, a downer for Canada , Volks EOS is a a tad smaller.... Chrysler 200 is simply a rehash of the old Sebring line but at least being front wheel drive. Lot of reviewers are carping about the seemingly lack of power of the Volvo C 70 compared to others in this category. This being said, With the general condition of roads here in Quebec, Any inclinations to push the speed and performance envelope seems futile, You are putting chances in causing damage to your cars and yourself.For long distance cruising and enjoying the ride, it's a total winner! Don't get me wrong, Volvo still is pretty performing, I drive a 2009 which i'm trading in for a C 70 Inscription next month. The former (2009) is about one of the best convertibles I've enjoyed. (had Porsches,BMWs, Mercedes) etc. Volvo is Safe, Practical 2 cars into one. 2009 had no problems except faulty bluetooth apparatus. Being in a smaller town, Volvo seems to fit better in a class car than driving and showing off in a Mercedes BMW or others. Besides Porsche 4 wheel drive soft top cabriolet and Audi all soft tops. It would be nice to have an all wheel drive model in a hardtop convertible. PS, Volvo's Swedish styling turns heads, Before Bimmers use to do it now, So many of them around (3 Series) and C series Mercedes that they are commonplace. Volvo service for this past car was simply outstanding. Looking forward to my new ''Inscription''.
No one has rated this review. Be the first to rate this review by indicating whether or not this review has been helpful to you.
|
Auto journalist & Consumer Ratings
Similar to 2012 Volvo C70
|