From GMM
The world of F1 has been split down the middle by the Fernando Alonso crash saga. In one camp are those who back the official story, believing McLaren-Honda that a gust of wind blew him off the Barcelona circuit and that the subsequent impact with the wall knocked him out. But arguably the biggest camp belongs to those who believe there is, at the very least, more to the story. Firstly, there are conflicting reports about the speed and trajectory at which Alonso lost control, and McLaren has neither confirmed nor denied the theories by releasing any telemetry. Dennis did, however, admit that Jenson Button looked at the data and declared it "strange".
"Something is amiss," former McLaren driver and now leading British commentator Martin Brundle told the Telegraph. "Something doesn't add up. It's a very strange situation. There's a lot of smoke and mirrors around." According to Brundle, the basic question to answer is whether Alonso crashed and was then injured, or did he suffer a medical issue prior to hitting the wall? "Is it cause or is it effect? We don't know," he said. "Everybody is a little bit coy about it so something isn't quite right." For instance, while team boss Eric Boullier initially confirmed Alonso had been concussed, Ron Dennis later backtracked, insisting there was "no concussion". But now, McLaren says Fernando Alonso is sitting out Australia because of the risk of 'second impact syndrome'. The Mayo Clinic defines the syndrome as the risk of death due to "experiencing a second concussion before signs and symptoms of a first concussion have resolved". Notwithstanding that Dennis denied Alonso even suffered a concussion, he also explained last week that the 33-year-old is now "physically perfect". "There is no concussion, anything. He had the symptoms at one stage but nothing that shows" now. A neurosurgeon at Barcelona's Quiron Dexeus hospital, Dr Roberto Belvis, also furrows his brow at McLaren saying it is the risk of 'second impact syndrome' (SIS) that has sidelined Alonso. "Preventing SIS is not logical if there are no symptoms of concussion. Once recovered, if there are no headaches, concentration problems or if the patient is speaking correctly, then there is no danger of a second impact," he said. Another theory, he said, is that Alonso's loss of consciousness remains unexplained. "If there was an unexplained loss of consciousness," Dr Belvis told the Spanish sports daily AS, "it is prudent for Alonso to not drive for three or four weeks. And to continue having tests. But it doesn't make sense to tell the media that he is 100 per cent recovered, but he will not compete due to SIS."
At the very least, McLaren might justly be accused of communicating badly. "It has been dealt with catastrophically badly," agreed Oskari Saari, a pundit for Finnish television MTV3, "which is strange, because they are experienced and good communicators." Saari also revealed that McLaren's doctor Aki Hintsa has been in Spain in the past days, "participating in the decision-making" about his recovery. He added: "There are always a terrific amount of rumours in F1, but there was no electric shock or anything. It is a concussion. The risk (of Alonso not competing in) Malaysia is lower, but I'm still a bit sceptical about it."
Recent Articles
|
Racing Multimedia
Recommendations |